|
Review
An article submitted for publication in the
Collection of scientific works IPMP of National Academy of Sciences of
Ukraine “Physical and technical problems of mining production” should pass
several stages of review:
§
open peer review – expert
review of relevant scientific profile (Doctor of Science) at the place of
work or study author. The editorial review sent in writing. The review
should include information on the reliability of the results, their
relevance and novelty and practical value of advice to the publication of
the article. This review, together with the article, must be submitted by
the author to the editorial office;
§
single-blind review – (the reviewer
knows the author, but the author does not know the reviewer) revise on the
subject of its publication profile, the correctness of the design,
compliance with ethical norms, the absence of plagiarism and subsequent
transfer to the next stage of review;
§
double-blind review – review by an
independent expert in the relevant field of knowledge upon submission by
the editorial board;
§
decision of the
editorial board of acceptance / rejection of paper for printing. Based on
the review by the decision of the editorial board of the author may receive
one of the following responses:
a) an article accepted for publication;
b) recommended to edit the article;
c) the author
was refused publication of the article.
|
